Obama or Hillary?

I get the sneaky feeling that whoever the nominee will be for the Republicans that they won't be running against Obama, rather it will be Hillary.

I believe that not only do the Democrats realize that Obama is losing more and more support but that all the Republican arguments have been tailored to defeating Obama.  Another candidate would throw the Republican's off their game giving the new candidate a very nice head start.

Obama is not the problem.  Obama is just the most honest representation of what the Democratic party has become, but not the problem.  Obama is the most current face upon a sinister plot to change America from it's foundations all the way to the top.

By the way, why is that allowed?  People keep mindlessly citing we are a Free Society, everyone should have an opinion!  True, but being Free does not mean allowing Freedom to be destroyed.  Like Lemmings these people are being driven over a cliff while chanting "Free speech! Free speech!".  But I digress.

The real problem is not Obama or even Hillary, but their religion of which they are merely it's practitioners.  The religion is a brand of Socialism that favors a rigid, oppressive, heaven-on-earth, thoroughly Secular society.  Socialism is a religion with many denomination sprouting from it - Fascism, Communism, National Socialism, Corporatism, (now) America's Democratic party & more.

To call someone a Liberal is missing most of the problem.  To call them a Radical Secularist is missing the point as well.  To argue that Obama must go is a trap.  Smoke & mirrors are a Socialists best friend & the Republicans have been chasing them through this maze for much too long.

We are in a religious war of ideas & the Republicans need to begin to argue accordingly.  Arguing with or against the latest "face" will not solve any problems nor further the cause of Freedom.  When the real enemy is not named or known for that matter, then nothing can be won since we weren't fighting the true battle much less the true war.

So far Newt Gingrich has been the only one to argue in these terms.  The terms that state we are fighting ideals & idealouges not the present representation of them.  In fact, he has been arguing this way all along.  We just haven't been listening.